Lord Mandelson must explain why he received $75,000 from Epstein.

Questions surrounding Lord Mandelson are mounting. Mandelson, who had very close ties with Epstein while serving as the UK representative to the USA and is alleged to have received $75,000 from him in three installments, claims he doesn’t remember the money, but documents clearly confirm this. These documents are so conclusive that they leave no room for his denial.

Meanwhile, the police have answered, or were forced to answer, the questions we asked yesterday. Yesterday, we asked, “Lord Mandelson needs to explain why he received $75,000 from Epstein. What did he receive in return?” Mandelson must have done something for Epstein and received money in return. No one sends money for free.

The police finally remembered they were the ones responsible for answering these questions and stepped in. The police are investigating allegations of misconduct in public office following claims that Lord Mandelson passed sensitive government information to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The police must find out what Mandelson received the $75,000 for and why he received it in three installments. Since three separate payments were made in three installments, it means Epstein received payment for three different services on three different dates. If it were a one-off service, Epstein would have sent $75,000 in one go. Three separate payments imply three different services. Mandelson did three different things for Epstein.

Lord Mandelson must answer questions, or the police must force him to. If he received this money in exchange for giving Epstein classified government information, that constitutes espionage. It also implies that Epstein wasn’t just someone who found underage girls for the wealthy, but the head of a large organization. It also reveals that Mandelson knew who he gave this information to and why.

READ  The first requirements for becoming rich: Yachts, jets, and virgin kid girls.

The police should be looking for answers to these questions, not methods to protect the Lords..